Cambridge Liberal Democrats - Winning for Cambridge with David Howarth Cambridge Lib Dems

Cambridge Lib Dems force vote on US Extradition Treaty

6.32.16pm BST (GMT +0100) Wed 12th Jul 2006

Cambridge Lib Dems have been instrumental in today's Emergency Debate victory over the Extradition Treaty with the United States of America.

Cambridge submitted a key policy motion to Federal Conference in 2003 which created party policy opposing the unequal extradition treaty. The policy was used to the full today when Nick Clegg MP won an emergency debate on extradition to the US and a vote opposing the treaty was lost by the Government 246 to 4.

Cambridge MP, David Howarth, spoke during the parliamentary debate and called for a new treaty to be negotiated.

David commented:

"The current extradition treaty with the United States is grossly unequal. Rather than try to persuade the US administration to ratify the treaty, the Government should take the opportunity to negotiate a new treaty, one that treats the UK and the US as equals.

David Howarth addressing Conference in Harrogate (photography: Alice Douglas)

David Howarth addressing party conference

"It is clear that there is huge opposition to the treaty amongst both MPs and Lords. The Government could not even persuade their own supporters to back them, with only 4 Labour MPs voting in support of the treaty today."

Bookmark this story at: del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg FacebookFacebook redditreddit StumbleUponStumbleUpon
Print this news story
Previous news story: 'How will this help Brookfields?' - MP asks Health Secretary (Wed 5th Jul 2006).
Next news story: ID card cash could reverse hospital cuts (Tue 11th Jul 2006).

Related News Stories:

Mon 23rd Jun 2008:

Wed 18th Jun 2008:

Fri 2nd May 2008:

Thu 21st Feb 2008:

Tue 24th Jul 2007:

Sat 14th Apr 2007:

Tue 9th May 2006:

Sat 28th Jan 2006:

Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 82b Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BX.
Published and promoted by Cambridge Liberal Democrats, 16 Signet Court, Cambridge .
The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider.