![]() |
|
![]() |
| 7th January 2009 | Cambridge Liberal Democrats | <info@cambridgelibdems.org.uk> |
Lib Dems condemn 'dead duck' nuclear policy4.45.31pm GMT Wed 11th Oct 2006 David Howarth, Lib Dem Spokesperson for Energy, has today called the Government's energy policy a 'dead duck'. Mr. Howarth's comments follow Energy Minister Malcolm Wick's claim yesterday that the Government will not subsidise nuclear power. Mr. Howarth responded: "Given the latest news of the huge cost overruns on the new Finnish nuclear reactor, the Government's claim to give no direct or indirect subsidies to the nuclear industry, seems to make their Energy Review policy favouring nuclear power a dead duck. Without expensive state subsidies, new nuclear power plants are not being built. "Furthermore the Government seems to be ignoring the support it already provides to the nuclear power industry through liability caps in the case of accidents. "I am also concerned that Alistair Darling has called for the private sector to cover the full costs of decommissioning but just their 'full share' of long-term waste management costs. If the Government intended no indirect subsidies to nuclear companies, why didn't it state openly that the industry would have to pay the 'full costs' not their 'full share' of the costs of waste management.
"The Government's claims about nuclear power are at odds with each other. It claims to be against indirect subsidies and yet ignores the subsidies the industry already receives. Whatever the Government is currently claiming, nuclear power, if we go down that route, will be an expensive mistake." State-owned French nuclear group, Areva, has reported losses of £180million in the first half of 2006 on a new reactor at Olkiluoto in Finland. This is the first nuclear reactor to be built in Western Europe in 20 years.
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Mon 1st Dec 2008: Lib Dems condemn government for tenants' distress Fri 14th Apr 2006: Published and promoted by Cambridge Liberal Democrats, 16 Signet Court, Cambridge . The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |